What are the main differences between authoritarian and democratic regimes?

Democratic and dictator atomic number 18 deuce very dissimilar and contradicting forms of politicsal regimes. They differ in the way a country or a state is managed. In stressing to line and discuss the differences surrounded by the two regimes, we should think what implications do the two regimes have on the political system. How be they different in terms of the institutions they intact? How argon rulers elected and which unity provides the more comprehensive office? How does the law making physical process differ, what implications do they have on the judiciary and civil rights? Is the diffusion of power different in the two regimes? And finally which wizard is more prosperous economically and in providing a permanent political system. I outset off by try to define the general characteristics of the two regimes. Authoritarian regime is a political rule forced upon its citizens without their consent. In other words, thither is no conception of free and honorable elections and rulers rule in their own interest over the mass. Rulers do not buttock the threat of exit or questioning and thus are not responsible to anyone. Organisations that are critical of the regime and attempt to discuss electric potential alternatives are either banned or severely punished. granting immunity of speech and the existence of unbiased media are inconceivable. Inflow of schooling is either manipulated or not allowed as it may assume a possible threat to the regime. nigh examples of states with these characteristics are Iraq, north-central Korea, Egypt, and UAE. Singe troupe states, dictatorships and military regimes are types of authoritarian rule. The branch two of these are similar to each other. one society states allow only one political party to make do in elections and rule over the state and dictatorships deck up when the leader of the single party accumulates power and forces it...

--References --> Democratic - non a form of government authoritarian - Not a form of government Well, it appears they are \systems of ruling\ and not \forms of government.\ What is a form of government: 1.) federal official nation 2.) Republic 3.) Monarchy 4.) complete Monarchy 5.) Communist 7.) Dictatorship ect, ect, ect Lets us timbre closer: Executive branches of government: 1.) A President 2.) A Prime Minister 3.) A King or king 4.) An Emporer or Empress 5.) A sheik or Shah 6.) For 3 ,4, and five yet a \Monarch.\ Please, realistically, do tell [FACTUAL WISE] how a comparative thorough Monarchy, where the MONARCH has executive authority, is not as good a FEDERAL REPUBLIC LIKE THAT OF THE UNITED STATES? \Election\ is scarce an ignorant cop-out. *waits for answer* If you want to get a coterminous essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay